Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <8050df0c-753b-1733-962f-b4065500a090@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:35:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: misc: qcom,fastrpc: allow FastRPC
 node without reg entry
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dylan Van Assche <me@dylanvanassche.be>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230327184811.499553-1-me@dylanvanassche.be>
 <20230327184811.499553-3-me@dylanvanassche.be>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230327184811.499553-3-me@dylanvanassche.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 27/03/2023 20:48, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> FastRPC nodes may exist without a registry property and actual

Why would they exist without unit address?

> Compute Banks  in some cases such as the SLPI on the Qualcomm SDM845 SoC.

I do not see there anything disallowing unit address yet...


> Relax the regex to allow such FastRPC nodes and remove 'reg' as a
> required property.

No, at least not without proper explanation why unit address is not
allowed for these.


Best regards,
Krzysztof