Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:35:15 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix VMA tree modification under mmap read lock
Message-Id: <20230327123515.bce6c1ea3660e9b17db50c33@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230327185532.2354250-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
References: <20230327185532.2354250-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:55:24 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:

> These patches have been in -next since next-20230301, and have received
> intensive testing in Android as part of the RCU page fault patchset.
> They were also sent as part of the "Per-VMA locks" v4 patch series.
> Patches 1 to 7 are bug fixes for RCU mode of the tree and patch 8 enables
> RCU mode for the tree.

What's happening here?  I assume you've decided that the first 8
patches of the "Per-VMA locks v4" series should be fast-tracked into
6.3-rcX and backported?  And we retain the rest of that series for
6.4-rc1?

Patch [3/8] hasn't come through to me, to linux-mm or to linux-kernel.