Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <000000000000bb028805f7dfab35@google.com> <2309ca53-a126-881f-1ffa-4f5415a32173@kernel.dk>
 <CANp29Y66H4-+d4hat_HCJck=u8dTn9Hw5KNzm1aYifQArQNNEw@mail.gmail.com> <75a684d6-8aca-8438-d303-f900b4db865d@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <75a684d6-8aca-8438-d303-f900b4db865d@kernel.dk>
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 22:12:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CANp29Y42=xHjyW5ZUDp8f3gaWV=_FVTb0SgtpECyX9yc8wxbbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] Monthly io-uring report
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+lista29bb0eabb2ddbae6f4a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:20=E2=80=AFPM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> > By the way, should F: fs/io-wq.c also be added to the IO_URING's
> > record in the MAINTAINERS file?
>
> I think you're looking at a really old tree, none of the supported
> stable trees even have any io_uring code in fs/ anymore. Maybe they need
> a MAINTAINERS update though? But even 5.10-stable has io-wq included,
> though it's pointing at the wrong path now...

Ah, sorry, I was indeed looking at an old crash report.

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>