Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753647AbXIUBUV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:20:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751147AbXIUBUI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:20:08 -0400 Received: from home.nigel.suspend2.net ([203.171.70.205]:50451 "EHLO home.nigel.suspend2.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751142AbXIUBUG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:20:06 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:19:59 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: nigel@suspend2.net, Pavel Machek , "Huang, Ying" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jeremy Maitin-Shepard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kexec Mailing List References: <1190266447.21818.17.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <200709211024.35991.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070920180623.5d7da7b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070920180623.5d7da7b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: Christian Reformed Churches of Australia MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709211120.00448.ncunningham@crca.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1358 Lines: 43 Hi. On Friday 21 September 2007 11:06:23 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +1000 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Hi Andrew. > > > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:09:41 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Seems like good enough for -mm to me. > > > > > > Pavel > > > > Andrew, if I recall correctly, you said a while ago that you didn't want > > another hibernation implementation in the vanilla kernel. If you're going to > > consider merging this kexec code, will you also please consider merging > > TuxOnIce? > > > > The theory is that kexec-based hibernation will mainly use preexisting > kexec code and will permit us to delete the existing hibernation > implementation. > > That's different from replacing it. TuxOnIce doesn't remove the existing implementation either. It can transparently replace it, but you can enable/disable that at compile time. Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Christian Reformed Church of Cobden 103 Curdie Street, Cobden 3266, Victoria, Australia Ph. +61 3 5595 1185 / +61 417 100 574 Communal Worship: 11 am Sunday. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/