Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:21:54 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     arinc9.unal@gmail.com
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        =?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Dorst <opensource@vdorst.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@routerhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@cs.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>,
        erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix port 5 phylink, phy muxing,
 and port 6
Message-ID: <20230328112154.qk5fwqaig4sit3ho@skbuf>
References: <20230326140818.246575-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230326140818.246575-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> This patch series is mainly focused on fixing the support for port 5 and
> setting up port 6.
> 
> The only missing piece to properly support port 5 as a CPU port is the
> fixes [0] [1] [2] from Richard.
> 
> Russell, looking forward to your review regarding phylink.
> 
> I have very thoroughly tested the patch series with every possible mode to
> use. I'll let the name of the dtb files speak for themselves.

This patch needs to be resubmitted (potentially as RFC) to the net-next
tree, and the commits readjusted to clarify what are fixes and what is
pure refactoring. With the mentioned that I have not reviewed the entire
series and I will not do that, either.