Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: ifd894703:Fastmail
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Use dma_default_coherent for devicetree default
 coherency
From:   Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230328074511.GA6188@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:02:12 +0100
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        mpe@ellerman.id.au, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        frowand.list@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9CCE7638-91FE-4B1F-9EAC-17362C041CE9@flygoat.com>
References: <20230321110813.26808-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
 <20230323072944.GA18524@lst.de>
 <60D7FE31-D708-4495-949F-3F64DDC11377@flygoat.com>
 <20230323213930.GA7730@lst.de>
 <CB41D3AF-20F6-42F3-9168-C0D6E716431A@flygoat.com>
 <20230328011812.GA21977@lst.de> <20230328074511.GA6188@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Precedence: bulk


> 2023=E5=B9=B43=E6=9C=8828=E6=97=A5 08:45=EF=BC=8CThomas Bogendoerfer =
<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>=20
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:18:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
>>>=20
>>> Please leave it for 6.4, as corresponding MIPS arch part will be a =
part of 6.4.
>>=20
>> Ok.  I'll really need review from the MIPS and drivers/of/ =
maintainers,
>> through.

+cc devicetree foks.

>=20
> I don't see any MIPS changes in the series besides the ifdef =
CONFIG_MIPS
> part in patch 1, which gets removed again in patch 4 (chance to drop
> that completely ?).

It was suggested by DMA folks to have that patch.

> I've merged the corresponding MIPS patches into mips-next last week.

Thanks
- Jiaxun

>=20
> Thomas.
>=20
> --=20
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not =
necessarily a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, =
2.3 ]