Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:52:08 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
        Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
        Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
        "kbus >> Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: intorduce __GFP_UNMAPPED and unmapped_alloc()
Message-ID: <ZCMpSJzXg/+JSHNY@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20230308094106.227365-1-rppt@kernel.org>
 <20230308094106.227365-2-rppt@kernel.org>
 <ZB1hS9lBabp1K7XN@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <ZB6W1C88TU6CcjJH@kernel.org>
 <ZCGdf95RvXB1RivU@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <ZCKIX3de5AZfGggK@kernel.org>
 <ZCKZuXxq38obmYpn@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <ZCMDmHSqOeCj1EIo@kernel.org>
 <CAB=NE6UTC4VkNM57GGJ3XkG_PWLkMfXv2e2=yQJhtM6Fc-uMsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZCMlyUewrAjTBb5i@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZCMlyUewrAjTBb5i@casper.infradead.org>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:37:13PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:18:50AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > differences with eBPF programs is that modules *can* be rather large
> > in size. What is the average size of modules? Well let's take a look:
> > 
> > mcgrof@bigtwin /mirror/code/mcgrof/linux-next (git::master)$ find ./
> > -name \*.ko| wc -l
> > 9173
> 
> ummm ... wc -c, surely?

That's the number of allmodconfig modules found.

mcgrof@fulton ~/linux (git::sysctl-next)$ find ./ -name \*.ko| head -2
./arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64.ko
./arch/x86/crypto/serpent-avx2.ko
mcgrof@fulton ~/linux (git::sysctl-next)$ find ./ -name \*.ko| head -2 |
wc -l
2
mcgrof@fulton ~/linux (git::sysctl-next)$ find ./ -name \*.ko| head -2 |
wc -c
70

wc -c would give a lot more. wc -l gives me the module count.

> > mcgrof@bigtwin /mirror/code/mcgrof/linux-next (git::master)$ find ./
> > -name \*.ko|  xargs stat -c "%s - %n" | sort -n -k 1 -r | tail
> > -$((9173-5)) | awk 'BEGIN {sum=0} {sum+=$1} END {print sum/NR/1024}'
> > 160.54
> 
> ... which invalidates all of these.

Not sure ? But regardless the *.text* lookup is what we care for though
which was later.

  Luis