Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283489AbRLMGgp>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:36:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S283500AbRLMGgf>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:36:35 -0500
Received: from femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.148]:35574 "EHLO
	femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S283489AbRLMGg0>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:36:26 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de>
Subject: Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up (fwd)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:20:03 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200112111723.fBBHNoY14804@ns.caldera.de>
In-Reply-To: <200112111723.fBBHNoY14804@ns.caldera.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <20011213063625.QQJV11490.femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 11 December 2001 12:23 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> For BSD advocates it might be a problem that these are unified diffs
> that are only applyable with GPL-licensed patch(1) version..

Why would BSD advocates be applying patches to the linux kernel?  (You don't 
need the tool to read a patch for ideas, do you?)  Why would BSD advocates 
apply a GPL-licensed patch to the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, and then 
complain that the tool they're using to do so is GPL-licensed?

I'm confused.  (Not SUPRISED, mind you.  Just easily confused.)

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/