Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:48:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87a5zwosd7.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection fails since 6.2 kernel
In-Reply-To: <ZCP5jOTNypwG4xK6@debian.me>
References: <87jzz13v7i.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <652a9a96-f499-f31f-2a55-3c80b6ac9c75@molgen.mpg.de>
        <ZCP5jOTNypwG4xK6@debian.me>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:40:44 +0200,
Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Does openSUSE Tumbleweed make it easy to bisect the regression at least on
> > “rc level”? It be great if narrow it more down, so we know it for example
> > regressed in 6.2-rc7.
> > 
> 
> Alternatively, can you do bisection using kernel sources from Linus's
> tree (git required)?

That'll be a last resort, if no one has idea at all :)


Takashi