Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:01:43 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Vaibhaav Ram T.L" <vaibhaavram.tl@microchip.com>
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kumaravel.thiagarajan@microchip.com,
        tharunkumar.pasumarthi@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 char-misc-next 3/5] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add
 EEPROM Functionality to read and write into EEPROM bin sysfs
Message-ID: <ZCQMh_TbPyLGhTD2@kroah.com>
References: <20230328144008.4113-1-vaibhaavram.tl@microchip.com>
 <20230328144008.4113-4-vaibhaavram.tl@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230328144008.4113-4-vaibhaavram.tl@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 08:10:06PM +0530, Vaibhaav Ram T.L wrote:
> From: Kumaravel Thiagarajan <kumaravel.thiagarajan@microchip.com>
> 
> Microchip's pci1xxxx is an unmanaged PCIe3.1a switch for consumer,
> industrial, and automotive applications. This switch integrates OTP
> and EEPROM to enable customization of the part in the field. 
> This patch adds EEPROM functionality to support the same.

Again, why not use the in-kernel eeprom api instead?

thanks,

greg k-h