Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:12:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection
 fails since 6.2 kernel
Message-ID: <20230329121232.7873ad95@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87a5zwosd7.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
References: <87jzz13v7i.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <652a9a96-f499-f31f-2a55-3c80b6ac9c75@molgen.mpg.de>
        <ZCP5jOTNypwG4xK6@debian.me>
        <87a5zwosd7.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:48:36 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:40:44 +0200,
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >=20
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: =20
> > > Does openSUSE Tumbleweed make it easy to bisect the regression at lea=
st on
> > > =E2=80=9Crc level=E2=80=9D? It be great if narrow it more down, so we=
 know it for example
> > > regressed in 6.2-rc7.
> > >  =20
> >=20
> > Alternatively, can you do bisection using kernel sources from Linus's
> > tree (git required)? =20
>=20
> That'll be a last resort, if no one has idea at all :)

I had a quick look yesterday, there's only ~6 or so commits to e1000e.
Should be a fairly quick bisection, hopefully?

Adding Sasha.