Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:50:28 +0900
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc:     Desnes Nunes <desnesn@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        noreply@ellerman.id.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dma-debug: Use %pa to format phys_addr_t
Message-ID: <ZCTOxOGDPoJoZDNW@infradead.org>
References: <20230329071405.1568021-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230329071405.1568021-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Precedence: bulk

I've applied this as it is the first fix I got into my mailbox for it.

Arnd sent one a little later, which uses %pap instead of %pa, which
confused me a bit.  The documentation seems to allow both without
any recommendation which one to use, which confuses me even further.