Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 03:40:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 03:39:49 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:47365 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 03:39:47 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4.16 & OOM killer screw up (fwd) To: landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:48:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hch@ns.caldera.de (Christoph Hellwig), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011213063625.QQJV11490.femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> from "Rob Landley" at Dec 12, 2001 05:20:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Tuesday 11 December 2001 12:23 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > For BSD advocates it might be a problem that these are unified diffs > > that are only applyable with GPL-licensed patch(1) version.. > > Why would BSD advocates be applying patches to the linux kernel? (You don't > need the tool to read a patch for ideas, do you?) Why would BSD advocates > apply a GPL-licensed patch to the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, and then > complain that the tool they're using to do so is GPL-licensed? > > I'm confused. (Not SUPRISED, mind you. Just easily confused.) Christoph, please remember that irony is not available between the Canadian and Mexican border.... you are confusing them again 8) Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/