Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:44:31 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Hans Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
        "maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER" 
        <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        =?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" <bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards
 drivers
Message-ID: <20230330154431.vii5llyqgiymievp@skbuf>
References: <20230327225933.plm5raegywbe7g2a@skbuf>
 <87ileljfwo.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
 <20230328114943.4mibmn2icutcio4m@skbuf>
 <87cz4slkx5.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
 <20230330124326.v5mqg7do25tz6izk@skbuf>
 <87wn2yxunb.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
 <20230330130936.hxme34qrqwolvpsh@skbuf>
 <875yaimgro.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
 <20230330150752.gdquw5kudtrqgzyz@skbuf>
 <877cuy6ynf.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <877cuy6ynf.fsf@kapio-technology.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:34:44PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 18:07, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Then, make DSA decide whether to handle the "added_by_user && !is_static"
> > combination or not, based on the presence of the DSA_FDB_FLAG_DYNAMIC
> > flag, which will be set in ds->supported_fdb_flags only for the mv88e6xxx
> > driver.
> 
> Okay, so this will require a new function in the DSA layer that sets
> which flags are supported and that the driver will call on
> initialization.
> 
> Where (in the DSA layer) should such a function be placed and what
> should it be called?

Don't overthink it, no new function. It's okay to just set
ds->supported_fdb_flags = DSA_FDB_FLAG_DYNAMIC in
mv88e6xxx_register_switch(), near the place where it currently sets
ds->num_lag_ids. Either before dsa_register_switch(), or within the
ds->ops->setup(). Both are fine, since the user network interfaces
haven't been allocated just yet by dsa_slave_create() and so, the
switchdev code path is inaccessible.

Existing drivers will have ds->supported_fdb_flags = 0 by default, since
they allocate the struct dsa_switch with kzalloc(), and DSA will have to
do something sane with that.