Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765582AbXIUVNw (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:13:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763177AbXIUVNl (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:13:41 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:32914 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763104AbXIUVNk (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:13:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:13:38 -0400 To: Nix Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.22.6] nfsd: fh_verify() `malloc failure' with lots of free memory leads to NFS hang Message-ID: <20070921211338.GF1951@fieldses.org> References: <874phtkk25.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20070917223600.GA30350@fieldses.org> <87zlzkkfvk.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20070918011257.GC2443@fieldses.org> <873ax7ua9j.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873ax7ua9j.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 35 On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:46:32PM +0100, Nix wrote: > On 18 Sep 2007, J. Bruce Fields told this: > > Also I suppose we should check which version of nfs-utils that fix is in > > and make sure distributions are getting the fixed nfs-utils before they > > get the new libc, or we're going to see this bug a lot.... > > Further info. This behaviour, although it is allowed by POSIX, is not > *specified*, as such, by it (ah! ambiguity! life would be so dull > without you!), and is not replicated by any other C library on the face > of the planet. > > Further, it's not even the behaviour of glibc, as such. > > It's the behaviour of glibc 2.6.x as patched with this Debian-specific > patch: Good grief. Well, I'd still count it as a bug in nfs-utils, then, but nfs-util's share of the blame is much less than we'd previously thought.... > This patch also breaks at least bash and zsh as well as nfs-utils (see > ) and I sort of > suspect it's not long for this world as a result. > > So this is much less nasty than we feared (well, and more nasty if you > happen to be a Debian unstable or testing user). OK! Sounds like good news. --b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/