Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?utf-8?Q?Ma=C3=ADra?= Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@redhat.com>,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: Exclude KUnit config dot-files
In-Reply-To: <CAGS_qxptBcUQByWAd6JHAxWb08czOiGnx0_uSvMKdhzTVwv=6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230330112743.2331141-1-javierm@redhat.com>
 <CAGS_qxptBcUQByWAd6JHAxWb08czOiGnx0_uSvMKdhzTVwv=6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: <875yaifacb.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> writes:

Hello Daniel,

> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:27=E2=80=AFAM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> There's a rule to ignore all the dot-files (.*) but we want to exclude t=
he
>> config files used by KUnit (.kunitconfig) since those are usually added =
to
>> allow executing test suites without having to enable custom config symbo=
ls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>
> FYI, Andy has a version of this patch from back in Jan here,
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230127145708.12915-1-andriy.she=
vchenko@linux.intel.com/
>
> I don't think anyone was adamantly opposed to it, but it's just been
> sitting on the list waiting.
>

Thanks. I missed that there was a patch posted already by Andy.

Masahiro-san,

Could you please pick that? It would not only facilitate adding new KUnit
test suites but also avoid existing reports sent by the kernel robot, i.e:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAGS_qxot1_+J3YCykkk0H1fZM6Cn6Pv4SFT6iC=
f9J7td1aH9HQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#mfcce95444b2df1c8242b03b7434e7730a6087663

--=20
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat