Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:55:25 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To:     Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        willy@infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()
Message-ID: <ZCXNDQ6Eslhj+9g5@moria.home.lan>
References: <20230327174402.1655365-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
 <20230327174402.1655365-2-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
 <52a5bd5c-d3a1-71d7-e1e5-7965501818bd@squashfs.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52a5bd5c-d3a1-71d7-e1e5-7965501818bd@squashfs.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
> results:
> 
> Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata length
> 32780

Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
(created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
so far I'm not able to reproduce this.