Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230330204217.47666-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20230330204217.47666-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230330204217.47666-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:31:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVseMfkQw5OnTM4CxW9BUCZ0pVZP6px67h8VPah0x3QAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: Switch using function
 pointers for cache management
To:     Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

Hi Prabhakar,

Thanks for your patch!

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:42 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> Currently, selecting which CMOs to use on a given platform is done using
> and ALTERNATIVE_X() macro. This was manageable when there were just two

the ALTERNATIVE_X()

> CMO implementations, but now that there are more and more platforms coming
> needing custom CMOs, the use of the ALTERNATIVE_X() macro is unmanageable.
>
> To avoid such issues this patch switches to use of function pointers

"the use" or "using"

> instead of ALTERNATIVE_X() macro for cache management (the only drawback

the ALTERNATIVE_X()

> being performance over the previous approach).
>
> void (*clean_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
> void (*inv_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
> void (*flush_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
>
> The above function pointers are provided to be overridden for platforms
> needing CMO.
>
> Convert ZICBOM and T-HEAD CMO to use function pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

> --- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c

> +#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_CMO

> +static void thead_register_cmo_ops(void)
> +{
> +       riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops(&thead_cmo_ops);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void thead_register_cmo_ops(void) {}
> +#endif

> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c

> @@ -75,3 +83,12 @@ void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
>              "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
>         noncoherent_supported = true;
>  }
> +
> +void riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops(const struct riscv_cache_ops *ops)
> +{
> +       if (!ops)
> +               return;

This is never true.
I guess originally you wanted to call riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops()
unconditionally from common code, instead of the various *register_cmo_ops()?
But that would have required something like

#ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_CMO
#define THEAD_CMO_OPS_PTR   (&thead_cmo_ops)
#else
#define THEAD_CMO_OPS_PTR   NULL
#endif

Or can we come up with some macro like pm_ptr(), but that also takes
care of the "&", so we can do "#define thead_cmo_ops NULL"?

> +
> +       noncoherent_cache_ops = *ops;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds