Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933825AbXIUXBU (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:01:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762519AbXIUXBE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:01:04 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58920 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753963AbXIUXBB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:01:01 -0400 Message-ID: <46F44D27.4050704@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:00:55 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: patches@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource References: <200709221231.836138000@suse.de> <20070921223251.1312913DCD@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20070921223251.1312913DCD@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1266 Lines: 35 Andi Kleen wrote: > Not needed on modern systems without external FPU > > TBD on i386 it is only needed for true 386s. Could remove it there > TBD for >= 486 > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > > --- > arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c > +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c > @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ struct resource standard_io_resources[] > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO }, > { .name = "dma2", .start = 0xc0, .end = 0xdf, > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO }, > - { .name = "fpu", .start = 0xf0, .end = 0xff, > - .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO } Since we are merging x86 and x86-64, I think it would be nice at least to CC Thomas on patches that increase 32/64-bit differences... because won't this patch have to be partial un-done when we merge i386 and x86-64? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/