Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
        loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/5] irqchip/loongson-eiointc: Fix incorrect use of acpi_get_vec_parent
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 19:38:57 +0800
Message-Id: <20230331113900.9105-3-lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20230331113900.9105-1-lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
References: <20230331113900.9105-1-lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

In eiointc_acpi_init(), a *eiointc* node is passed into
acpi_get_vec_parent() instead of a required *NUMA* node (on some chip
like 3C5000L, a *NUMA* node means a *eiointc* node, but on some chip
like 3C5000, a *NUMA* node contains 4 *eiointc* nodes), and node in
struct acpi_vector_group is essentially a *NUMA* node, which will
lead to no parent matched for passed *eiointc* node. so the patch
adjusts code to use *NUMA* node for parameter node of
acpi_set_vec_parent/acpi_get_vec_parent.

Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
index 62a632d73991..d16ed64feb3d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
@@ -280,9 +280,6 @@ static void acpi_set_vec_parent(int node, struct irq_domain *parent, struct acpi
 {
 	int i;
 
-	if (cpu_has_flatmode)
-		node = cpu_to_node(node * CORES_PER_EIO_NODE);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_IO_PICS; i++) {
 		if (node == vec_group[i].node) {
 			vec_group[i].parent = parent;
@@ -349,8 +346,16 @@ static int __init pch_pic_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 static int __init pch_msi_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 					const unsigned long end)
 {
+	struct irq_domain *parent;
 	struct acpi_madt_msi_pic *pchmsi_entry = (struct acpi_madt_msi_pic *)header;
-	struct irq_domain *parent = acpi_get_vec_parent(eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node, msi_group);
+	int node;
+
+	if (cpu_has_flatmode)
+		node = cpu_to_node(eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node * CORES_PER_EIO_NODE);
+	else
+		node = eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node;
+
+	parent = acpi_get_vec_parent(node, msi_group);
 
 	if (parent)
 		return pch_msi_acpi_init(parent, pchmsi_entry);
@@ -379,6 +384,7 @@ int __init eiointc_acpi_init(struct irq_domain *parent,
 	int i, ret, parent_irq;
 	unsigned long node_map;
 	struct eiointc_priv *priv;
+	int node;
 
 	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!priv)
@@ -421,8 +427,12 @@ int __init eiointc_acpi_init(struct irq_domain *parent,
 				  "irqchip/loongarch/intc:starting",
 				  eiointc_router_init, NULL);
 
-	acpi_set_vec_parent(acpi_eiointc->node, priv->eiointc_domain, pch_group);
-	acpi_set_vec_parent(acpi_eiointc->node, priv->eiointc_domain, msi_group);
+	if (cpu_has_flatmode)
+		node = cpu_to_node(acpi_eiointc->node * CORES_PER_EIO_NODE);
+	else
+		node = acpi_eiointc->node;
+	acpi_set_vec_parent(node, priv->eiointc_domain, pch_group);
+	acpi_set_vec_parent(node, priv->eiointc_domain, msi_group);
 	ret = acpi_cascade_irqdomain_init();
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.31.1