Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758314AbXIVIjR (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:39:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751312AbXIVIjF (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:39:05 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51245 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750974AbXIVIjC (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:39:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:11:56 +0530 (IST) From: Satyam Sharma X-X-Sender: satyam@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in To: Mel Gorman cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jason.wessel@windriver.com Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 In-Reply-To: <20070918174408.GC1804@skynet.ie> Message-ID: References: <20070918011841.2381bd93.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070918174408.GC1804@skynet.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 446 Lines: 11 > -static volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; > +volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; That looks fishy to me. Why is it volatile-qualified? And does that actually want to be a per-cpu var? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/