Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:06:10 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To:     Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Message-ID: <6427838247d16_c503a2087e@john.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20230327-vsock-sockmap-v4-0-c62b7cd92a85@bytedance.com>
References: <20230327-vsock-sockmap-v4-0-c62b7cd92a85@bytedance.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Add support for sockmap to vsock.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS
> requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the
> performance of such a setup.
> 
> Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by
> 121% in basic testing.
> 
> Tested as follows.
> 
> Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock redirector -> host vsock
>        server
> Threads: 1
> Payload: 64k
> No sockmap:
> - 76.3 MB/s
> - The guest vsock redirector was
>   "socat VSOCK-CONNECT:2:1234 UNIX-RECV:/path/to/sock"
> Using sockmap (this patch):
> - 168.8 MB/s (+121%)
> - The guest redirector was a simple sockmap echo server,
>   redirecting unix ingress to vsock 2:1234 egress.
> - Same sender and server programs
> 
> *Note: these numbers are from RFC v1
> 
> Only the virtio transport has been tested. The loopback transport was
> used in writing bpf/selftests, but not thoroughly tested otherwise.
> 
> This series requires the skb patch.

Appears reasonable to me although I didn't review internals of all
the af_vsock stuff. I see it got merged great.

One nit, I have a series coming shortly to pull the tests out of
the sockmap_listen and into a sockmap_vsock because I don't think they
belong in _listen but that is just a refactor.