Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 2 Apr 2023 20:37:13 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] tools/nolibc: add libc-test binary
Message-ID: <ZCnLWQ2BCisgmP+a@1wt.eu>
References: <20230328-nolibc-printf-test-v3-0-ddc79f92efd5@weissschuh.net>
 <20230328-nolibc-printf-test-v3-1-ddc79f92efd5@weissschuh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230328-nolibc-printf-test-v3-1-ddc79f92efd5@weissschuh.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 06:04:34PM +0000, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> This can be used to easily compare the behavior of nolibc to the system
> libc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wei?schuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> 
> ---
> 
> Feel free to drop this if it does not fit in.

On the opposite! I wanted to do it, you beat me to it. I'm just going to
add an entry for it in the help message.

Thank you!
Willy