Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:50:45 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Cc:     ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
        robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mt7621: Use dev_err_probe()
Message-ID: <2e4f27f0-a4ac-4523-8f90-695a62973bd0@kili.mountain>
References: <202303231145121987818@zte.com.cn>
 <CAMhs-H_-kQ0FGP3L1xJ=ec_xJ59a2OztMLLjEQmQfYFOEa4DfA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMhs-H_-kQ0FGP3L1xJ=ec_xJ59a2OztMLLjEQmQfYFOEa4DfA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:23:26AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:45 AM <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> >
> > Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> > index 63a5f4463a9f..964de0e8c6a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> > @@ -220,10 +220,9 @@ static int mt7621_pcie_parse_port(struct mt7621_pcie *pcie,
> >         }
> >
> >         port->pcie_rst = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(node, NULL);
> > -       if (PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {

So the theory here is that -EPROBE_DEFER is recoverable but other errors
are not so we just ignore them?  Error pointers will trigger a WARN() in
mt7621_control_assert/deassert().


> > --
> > 2.25.1
> 
> Also, this is not a probe(), so I don't see a point of using
> dev_err_probe() here.

It's a weird thing to return -EPROBE_DEFER from something which is not
a probe function...  Someone told me I should write a Smatch check for
it but I never got around to doing that.

In this case, I guess the user is supposed to see the error message and
manually fix the probe order?  The dev_err_probe() will change the error
message into a debug message so the user will not see it and will not be
able to fix it.  So using dev_err_probe() will break things for the
user.

regards,
dan carpenter