Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755417AbXIWBF0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:05:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752183AbXIWBFR (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:05:17 -0400 Received: from host721684293.hns-noc-rev-lu.com ([72.168.93.42]:57003 "EHLO aexorsyst.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752181AbXIWBFQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:05:16 -0400 From: "John Z. Bohach" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo->si_status) be true EVEN IF the SIGNAL was caught by the child? Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:05:07 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200709221122.09523.jzb2@aexorsyst.com> <200709221318.53579.jzb2@aexorsyst.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709221805.07463.jzb2@aexorsyst.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 538 Lines: 16 On Saturday 22 September 2007 16:35:56 Andreas Schwab wrote: > "John Z. Bohach" writes: > > if (WIFEXITED(siginfo->si_status)) > > That does not make any sense. si_status is _not_ a wait status. > > Andreas. Thank you for clearing that up. That explains it. --john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/