Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f0a40f3a-2ff6-5529-ad84-1c66f7e381ea@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:52:46 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/14] extcon: Use unique number for the extcon device
 ID
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
References: <20230322144005.40368-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20230322144005.40368-8-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230322144005.40368-8-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 23. 3. 22. 23:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The use of atomic variable is still racy when we do not control which
> device has been unregistered and there is a (theoretical) possibility
> of the overflow that may cause a duplicate extcon device ID number
> to be allocated next time a device is registered.
> 
> Replace above mentioned approach by using IDA framework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 14e66e21597f..0d261ec6c473 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
> @@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ struct extcon_cable {
>  
>  static struct class *extcon_class;
>  
> +static DEFINE_IDA(extcon_dev_ids);
>  static LIST_HEAD(extcon_dev_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(extcon_dev_list_lock);
>  
> @@ -1248,7 +1250,6 @@ static int extcon_alloc_groups(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  {
>  	int ret, index = 0;
> -	static atomic_t edev_no = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
>  
>  	ret = create_extcon_class();
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1275,8 +1276,14 @@ int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  		dev_err(&edev->dev, "extcon device name is null\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	dev_set_name(&edev->dev, "extcon%lu",
> -			(unsigned long)atomic_inc_return(&edev_no));
> +
> +	ret = ida_simple_get(&extcon_dev_ids, 0, INT_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);


ida_simple_get and ida_simple_remove are deprecated on 
commit 3264ceec8f17 ("lib/idr.c: document that ida_simple_{get,remove}()
are deprecated"). Instead of them, better to use ida_alloc and ida_free 
according to the comments.


> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	edev->id = ret;
> +
> +	dev_set_name(&edev->dev, "extcon%d", edev->id);
>  
>  	ret = extcon_alloc_cables(edev);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1368,6 +1375,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	ida_simple_remove(&extcon_dev_ids, edev->id);

ditto.

> +
>  	device_unregister(&edev->dev);
>  
>  	if (edev->mutually_exclusive && edev->max_supported) {
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.h b/drivers/extcon/extcon.h
> index 15616446140d..877c0860e300 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.h
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   *			{0x3, 0x6, 0x5, 0}. If it is {0xFFFFFFFF, 0}, there
>   *			can be no simultaneous connections.
>   * @dev:		Device of this extcon.
> + * @id:			Unique device ID of this extcon.
>   * @state:		Attach/detach state of this extcon. Do not provide at
>   *			register-time.
>   * @nh_all:		Notifier for the state change events for all supported
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ struct extcon_dev {
>  
>  	/* Internal data. Please do not set. */
>  	struct device dev;
> +	int id;
>  	struct raw_notifier_head nh_all;
>  	struct raw_notifier_head *nh;
>  	struct list_head entry;

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi