Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2023 00:34:58 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To:     Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>,
        "senozhatsky@chromium.org" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        GyeongHwan Hong <gh21.hong@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vsprintf: compile error on %09pK
Message-ID: <20230403153458.GE12892@google.com>
References: <CGME20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p3>
 <20230403104617epcms1p383bacbca705c0d7e4fffca6833050e42@epcms1p3>
 <ZCrMMQt2xnnZIyz6@alley>
 <CAJrd-Uvzy18SfjjqbqZCPHjw+ujQXsBpvov4b=bfAwZrj=bCAA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJrd-Uvzy18SfjjqbqZCPHjw+ujQXsBpvov4b=bfAwZrj=bCAA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On (23/04/03 23:39), Jaewon Kim wrote:
[..]
> 
> Okay, then we can't use %09pK. I've just wondered because %9pK works.

This is not per printk / kernel, Wformat warnings come from the
compiler.

Per C11 (7.21.6 6):
 0  For d, i, o, u, x, X, a, A, e, E, f, F, g, and G conversions, leading zeros
    (following any indication of sign or base) are used to pad to the field width
    rather than performing space padding
    ...
    For other conversions, the behavior is undefined.

So using 0 for p should trigger an undefined behavior as far as the
standard C concerned. Unless I'm missing something.