Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:23:42 +0300
From:   Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vblank: Simplify drm_dev_has_vblank()
Message-ID: <ZCr9jrhTyGuZA+Qt@intel.com>
References: <20230403160735.1211468-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230403160735.1211468-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:07:35AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> 
> What does vblank have to do with num_crtcs?  Well, this was technically
> correct, but you'd have to go look at where num_crtcs is initialized to
> understand why.  Lets just replace it with the simpler and more obvious
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> index 877e2067534f..ad34c235d853 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_init);
>   */
>  bool drm_dev_has_vblank(const struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
> -	return dev->num_crtcs != 0;
> +	return !!dev->vblank;

The compiler knows how to turn things into a boolean.

Or I guess if we want to be a bit more explicit we could
write this as
 return dev->vblank != NULL;
but IIRC that will make checkpatch complain because of
someone's personal taste.

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_has_vblank);
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel