Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:02:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:02:27 -0500 Received: from tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil ([204.222.179.33]:25666 "EHLO tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:02:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:01:56 -0600 (CST) From: Jesse Pollard Message-Id: <200112131501.JAA41764@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> To: bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org, Stewart Allen Subject: Re: passing params to boot readonly In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: [XMailTool v3.1.2b] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --------- Received message begins Here --------- > > On December 12, 2001 21:50, Stewart Allen wrote: > > I'm in a bit of a pickle and need to find a way to pass boot params to a > > reiserfs rootfs to *prevent* it from replaying the journal on single-user > > boot. This may seem like a strange request, but I've got a degraded RAID > > array that I need to poke around in before deciding whether or not to send > > a disk off to a rehab lab. If the replay occurs, it will potentially > > destroy the fs since I'm using a degraded snapshot of the failed disk in > > hopes of reclaiming *some* of my data. The system is running 2.2.x (can't > > remember and can't find out w/out booting). > > > > Do I have a snowball's chance of pulling this off? > > Well, kinda. The only thing that can deter ReiserFS from replaying the > journal is convincing it that the physical media it's on is actually read > only. Some quick less/grep work revealed that there is no option that makes > the SCSI subsystem claim its devices are readonly (although it'd be extremely > useful for situations such as this). > > It'd probably be pretty easy to make a boot disk using a hacked version of > ReiserFS that refuses to replay the journal, by adding a "return 0;" near the > top of journal_read(struct super_block *) in journal.c. However, you might > feel more comfortable sending it off for data recovery than testing kernel > hacks on it ;) Wouldn't it be better to make a backup (dd copy) of the disk volume to another drive? The raid would not be mounted, so the fs would not be updated. I would recommend that be done even before sending the disk out. ALTERNATIVE TO READ-ONLY and this might not be possible. If the raid is SCSI based, then there is (should be) a read-only switch in the disk configuration. Most disks do not have a jumper there, and since they are usually internal only, the option is not used. Putting the jumper on (or removing one if it is there - depends on the drive) will make the disk read-only. Even some IDE drives may have this option, though finding documentation on it may be difficult to locate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil Any opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/