Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-238-g746678b8b6-fm-20230329.001-g746678b8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <377d2841-18b5-4f61-b675-3a7c2e0db3b2@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZCu1tFrQCVe2sgNz@infradead.org>
References: <20230330204217.47666-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20230330204217.47666-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <ZCu1tFrQCVe2sgNz@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 04 Apr 2023 08:50:16 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To:     "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Conor.Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        guoren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        "Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        "Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: Switch using function pointers
 for cache management
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, at 07:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:42:12PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>> 
>> Currently, selecting which CMOs to use on a given platform is done using
>> and ALTERNATIVE_X() macro. This was manageable when there were just two
>> CMO implementations, but now that there are more and more platforms coming
>> needing custom CMOs, the use of the ALTERNATIVE_X() macro is unmanageable.
>> 
>> To avoid such issues this patch switches to use of function pointers
>> instead of ALTERNATIVE_X() macro for cache management (the only drawback
>> being performance over the previous approach).
>> 
>> void (*clean_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
>> void (*inv_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
>> void (*flush_range)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
>> 
>
> NAK.  Function pointers for somthing high performance as cache
> maintainance is a complete no-go.

As we already discussed, this is now planned to use a direct
branch to the zicbom version when the function pointer is NULL,
which should be a fast predicted branch on all standard implementations
and only be slow on the nonstandard ones, which I think is a reasonable
compromise.

I'm also not sure I'd actually consider this a fast path, since
there is already a significant cost in accessing the invalidated
cache lines afterwards, which is likely going to be much higher than
the cost of an indirect branch.

I suppose an alternative would be to use the linux/static_call.h
infrastructure to avoid the overhead of indirect branches altogether.
Right now, this has no riscv specific implementation though, so
using it just turns into a regular indirect branch until someone
implements static_call.

       Arnd