Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:22:41 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        "Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracepoint: Fix CFI failures with tp_sub_func
Message-ID: <20230404162232.1b2f4c2f@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <ZCwDAnRHjNr9ZftR@FVFF77S0Q05N>
References: <20230324123142.7463-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
        <75dbeff6-fd0c-aec1-5821-919088eda6c4@efficios.com>
        <ZCwDAnRHjNr9ZftR@FVFF77S0Q05N>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:59:26 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> Sorry to ping, but are you planning to pick this up, and/or did you want this
> resent with the Testing-by typo fixed?
> 
> I couldn't spot it in the tracing tree, and I'm not sure if it's still on your
> TODO list for review or has just been missed.

Actually, we may be going back to your original patches, as having a stub
function for every trace event will allow us to attach fprobes to them. And
we actually have a need to do that (connecting to tracepoints to get more
info than the trace event gives).

Masami is currently working on this.

-- Steve