Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758816AbXIXOlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:41:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752736AbXIXOlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:41:44 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:43099 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751639AbXIXOlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:41:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:41:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Jiri Slaby cc: Andrew Morton , David Brownell , , Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 In-Reply-To: <46F7AEA7.7060809@gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 951 Lines: 26 On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 09/24/2007 11:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/ > > Fine, but on some boots (I noticed this on rc6-mm1 too, but not before): > 0000:00:1a.7 EHCI: BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug ?) 01010001 > 0000:00:1d.7 EHCI: BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug ?) 01010001 Any changes in your BIOS setup? What about with vanilla 2.6.23-rc6? Or vanilla 2.6.23-rc7? The USB part of the code here hasn't changed in quite a while. Any difference in behavior must be the result of changes in some other part of the kernel. Possibly ACPI. This might be a good job for git-bisect. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/