Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:30:31 +0200
From:   Valentin =?utf-8?B?VmlkacSH?= <vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        Micah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= <mic@digikod.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security, lsm: security_old_inode_init_security() Handle
 multi LSM registration
Message-ID: <ZC2UF7FfJ1XDEu67@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
References: <20230401214151.1243189-1-vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
 <CAHC9VhT6VXwybScqsnYHHtbHNPoWMVQJzQ7VAccm2MWZEz+5Dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZCnff6gUjU89zfAb@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
 <CAHC9VhTCafjmo7k=qGnOMDm4s4UHL9g=o5KgRfg9_xwWCzUhcw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhTCafjmo7k=qGnOMDm4s4UHL9g=o5KgRfg9_xwWCzUhcw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:28:11PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> I think backporting it to the stable kernels would be okay, but I'd
> prefer to let it get some more testing in linux-next first if that's
> okay with you.  Since we are currently at v6.3-rc5 and this patch is
> scheduled to go up to Linus during the next merge window, it might
> make the most sense to give this two more weeks in -next, let it land
> in Linus' tree, and they ask the stable team for a backport ("Option
> 2" in the stable kernel docs):
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> 
> Thoughts?

No problem for me, as long as it gets included in the LTS at some point :)

-- 
Valentin