Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com
Cc:     mgorman@suse.de, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: mlock: use folios_put() in mlock_folio_batch()
Date:   Thu,  6 Apr 2023 00:18:54 +0800
Message-Id: <20230405161854.6931-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230405161854.6931-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
References: <20230405161854.6931-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Since we have updated mlock to use folios, it's better
to call folios_put() instead of calling release_pages()
directly.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 617469fce96d..40b43f8740df 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void mlock_folio_batch(struct folio_batch *fbatch)
 
 	if (lruvec)
 		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
-	release_pages(fbatch->folios, fbatch->nr);
+	folios_put(fbatch->folios, folio_batch_count(fbatch));
 	folio_batch_reinit(fbatch);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1