Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1926200rwl; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 03:27:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YLxFklgMM6bahWlSndl04pnzgfLDPDuNCmJw2cRFzz0pXFTKlHeSIW2LmpPR/EY9feyOCH X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2813:b0:500:58cb:3afd with SMTP id h19-20020a056402281300b0050058cb3afdmr3873744ede.3.1680776857621; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 03:27:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680776857; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g5g3rP4NwWV3JkQL4zzGzQjclnGnUVEGqU/zueAbuxgWFFm54LK+zPQP3bPVmwDR17 QdH5I8GTRb6kPG4d+etmzOy2+AEhXJmxddW+Q6LtwTFI5QJUoZqJtItGlzhzvYFySqPb 1eFUAhvwHxi4XhB0YgYQ13fxtNwX5aOgI97nMGpuvlQ/FDETbsy/3BVOEbBVGx3f39V3 AOaLERc37sikyaNagriZVK/pf5dF9XWOyjwuIcdtyTYEbxENj/P7pUQ0CdY3h6NyiGO4 LQC5bTgBWyaWEdYkUo6KxPbYR7ynEtGevRP8YCzOXXOS1N84bXppoNk2Z5+yXfWpznqz ovTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=FUqr4+AE8CYdFwbq+M/eo0cAw7glnw3zicOfEC7Y8Dg=; b=pPMQ/2Oyd8wI+U7A7cu4/7s77g9MByHzrS/ADv/R26QxE3orhz4qMaPSDHToxwzKql 2JVkoAaJmJCcjxMGKkcLVXDDSTl3g2/dx8dM0SHgQEedpB60yXDm3GxLM3QsLGRfo1Lz awYh3cyaAB4tCjVK/ja040ED71WutPq81HCTeU96mF/CowrXnFzbKdBVbv9/6yuKLTVJ 8vPqLnFvD5EADfuHMesXJTN4V3pZCLffN8TuS4gL0EUema2vR6K2cs4f6h5HFrOzOQe9 IcReraO8HtN6+Ehl/yX1+ILOp5HDsb67hDWzq/CVNoE+Q/rV6GYuUoqW4MpBOyTmLA61 Gh/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ba6-20020a0564021ac600b005021d2480f8si842815edb.282.2023.04.06.03.27.13; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 03:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236767AbjDFKQQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 06:16:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229935AbjDFKQO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 06:16:14 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3B94213B; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 03:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Pscnh3jgGz6DBZ9; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:15:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:16:08 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:16:07 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Yicong Yang CC: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" , Will Deacon , , , , , , Dan Williams , "Shaokun Zhang" , Jiucheng Xu , Khuong Dinh , Robert Richter , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Frank Li , Shuai Xue , Vineet Gupta , Shawn Guo , Fenghua Yu , Dave Jiang , Wu Hao , Tom Rix , , Suzuki K Poulose , Liang Kan Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent Message-ID: <20230406111607.00007be5@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <61f8e489-ae76-38d6-2da0-43cf3c17853d@huawei.com> References: <20230404134225.13408-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20230404134225.13408-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <61f8e489-ae76-38d6-2da0-43cf3c17853d@huawei.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:03:27 +0800 Yicong Yang wrote: > On 2023/4/4 21:41, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Some PMUs have well defined parents such as PCI devices. > > As the device_initialize() and device_add() are all within > > pmu_dev_alloc() which is called from perf_pmu_register() > > there is no opportunity to set the parent from within a driver. > > > > Add a struct device *parent field to struct pmu and use that > > to set the parent. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams > > > > --- > > Previously posted in CPMU series hence the change log. > > v3: No change > > --- > > include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 + > > kernel/events/core.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h > > index d5628a7b5eaa..b99db1eda72c 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h > > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h > > @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ struct pmu { > > > > struct module *module; > > struct device *dev; > > + struct device *parent; > > const struct attribute_group **attr_groups; > > const struct attribute_group **attr_update; > > const char *name; > > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > > index fb3e436bcd4a..a84c282221f2 100644 > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > > @@ -11367,6 +11367,7 @@ static int pmu_dev_alloc(struct pmu *pmu) > > > > dev_set_drvdata(pmu->dev, pmu); > > pmu->dev->bus = &pmu_bus; > > + pmu->dev->parent = pmu->parent; > > If there's no parent assigned, is it ok to add some check here? Then we can find it earlier > maybe at develop stage. In the long run I agree it would be good. Short term there are more instances of struct pmu that don't have parents than those that do (even after this series). We need to figure out what to do about those before adding checks on it being set. Jonathan > > Thanks. > > > pmu->dev->release = pmu_dev_release; > > > > ret = dev_set_name(pmu->dev, "%s", pmu->name); > >