Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:45:18 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: rcar: drop of_match_ptr for ID table
Message-ID: <ZC7M7rpyEQaI4YJJ@orome>
References: <20230312135120.357713-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qzk1RDxBtReFCSbK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230312135120.357713-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25)
Precedence: bulk


--qzk1RDxBtReFCSbK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always
> used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI
> matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here).  This
> also fixes !CONFIG_OF error:
>=20
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c:252:34: error: =E2=80=98rcar_pwm_of_table=E2=80=
=99 defined but not used [-Werror=3Dunused-const-variable=3D]
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>=20
> ---
>=20
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Extend commit msg.
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

I've applied both patches with an updated commit message clarifying the
exact configuration as pointed out by Uwe.

Thanks,
Thierry

--qzk1RDxBtReFCSbK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TBNW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qzk1RDxBtReFCSbK--