Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <565e6575-91f7-9ca2-1505-17527b95a816@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:08:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] Introduction-of-HP-BIOSCFG-driver-documentation
Content-Language: en-US, nl
To:     Jorge Lopez <jorgealtxwork@gmail.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=c3=9fschuh?= <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Cc:     Linux x86 Platform Drivers <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230403211548.6253-1-jorge.lopez2@hp.com>
 <ZCuMkdb6jeL4S8hz@debian.me>
 <CAOOmCE-5NHkYcmBP1GGpr=sEoxF9jkjj1LevekEm8R0wbrM4xQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOOmCE-5NHkYcmBP1GGpr=sEoxF9jkjj1LevekEm8R0wbrM4xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi All,

FWIW I have been reading along with both the v6 and
this v7 posting.

Thomas, Mark, thank you for your review / feedback
on this series.

On 4/4/23 15:37, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> Hi Bagas,
> 
>>
>> Where is the rest of patches if this is a series? Had they been merged?
>>
> 
> There is only one change as requested by  Thomas Weißschuh
> 
>> Feel free to ONLY submit the patch with the documentation for the next
>> revision. Then we can nail down the interface and initial functionality
>> and you don't always have to adapt the code to the changing interface.
> 
> Perhaps, I misunderstood Thomas request.   I will address a few other
> comments and will submit all files again.

I think that Thomas' suggestion to first focus on getting
the userspace API right and then implement the agreed
upon API is a good idea.

So for the next version just post only the documentation
patch again please.

Note it is not the intention to merge just the documentation
patch without merging the code first.

The idea is to first nail the API down and then modify
the code once to implement the agreed upon API.

Then once the API has been agreed upon post newer
versions which also include the code again.

And then once people are also happy with the code
we can merge both the code + documentation in one go.

Regards,

Hans


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jorge
>