Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc:     Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
        Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@quicinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] sched: Consider CPU contention in frequency & load-balance busiest CPU selection
Date:   Thu,  6 Apr 2023 17:50:29 +0200
Message-Id: <20230406155030.1989554-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

This is the implementation of the idea to factor in root cfs_rq
runnable_avg as a way to consider CPU contention for CPU frequency and
`migrate_util` type load-balance busiest CPU selection.

Discussion happened under:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/424e2c81-987d-f10e-106d-8b4c611768bc@arm.com

Dietmar Eggemann (1):
  sched: Consider CPU contention in frequency & load-balance busiest CPU
    selection

 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |  3 ++-
 kernel/sched/fair.c              |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/sched.h             | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1