Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp148041rwl; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:23:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZNYuAsUOtC/SYEdpFTrTtLAKOjwJ+1WODGn72x6wz/2m0ExVVDR4eervxIgcEdCZqkZ/Bb X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2be7:b0:932:a14e:4c57 with SMTP id gv39-20020a1709072be700b00932a14e4c57mr405145ejc.76.1680823432884; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:23:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680823432; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ARL4SAtnvNAxUtZFbRHNNFN6DlFxnoUflaiqM93b80uERLaXom9UGGcwP/xpgzTS1z HxpCJUNlvPsO0qS/gWiNmzKzS5RxmaLo6UOHTYdc6VKFz4pg1fLAmmXGEs4H6c0dV0c3 mW6tcUi9Mzrp+NHnb0A446OmReAq7M7YDeGLv/PPegvzSq3YXPu8JSrm8IBKjhG43w3+ +/ffkpgqLdd37lHR24KkJLarCyAFtjz3nEwZBlnjU3eibZ3NLQyAwlLeYL6O+t4xjdmA 72ca0tk7Ke032TWAgjrDOc5UeckpVV6EbmAcrrixPQCzbJTkk+EWexNauA5KqUq4iNbF roDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=JXgNfES2xPmLIzA9XQu7yHUn8Ass15lCW/P1iL99/uE=; b=vUSJfmgcHJ3j8YDIZrEcok9z+fvMd9NUPlUUlQvHgYZM5C0HELXQJm95KwTNvL0Nz3 DizR4sdbP2vRBE35vObYwvoHVEjFQWHaPz23xSJrutmn+Wbxz8nu1cRlsH+xAWOORLQN LEBnKpXpt9gGmqvTP5LsAdl2CQ8rKmBTYMMV3UyFaDTDI1cEakh5bqbYJZRoeq3LXbpS R1lyftBgKLpmPkekfpfs4O8z2RI0Y/3YODAnM44A6i9rCPnbFSP5FkICFXYnU8uTiGic GuM4UziQphT6Mg1hm4GltYPmFnyXtNY1oSoAXoM3uKTQlrl+3XZO7Zb/Ed7/F6dbYDSh mP4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=HR7UuBf4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f26-20020a056402151a00b004acc454abe7si1913867edw.260.2023.04.06.16.23.20; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=HR7UuBf4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239366AbjDFW55 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:57:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58930 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232836AbjDFW54 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:57:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A2D959D8 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id j14-20020a17090a7e8e00b002448c0a8813so2629989pjl.0 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680821875; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JXgNfES2xPmLIzA9XQu7yHUn8Ass15lCW/P1iL99/uE=; b=HR7UuBf4gWbhbVlkBYitBViCVWlQ/s3oikpp4qMOZGC23Wn7C+/HAg9G3DJaHwPKjI /4kFwj7mU8d768xogqeRJbJXcsUQ7YOFigy3I3fttmqsZdBwQy5P68Ti18yaKUjvNx8E ob9nwpa2t3NZCxfEdG89sJjAPcVWust+QqYLfTetUNrgsSuZzuGeR6ylQQKpy5hwLbMx YCvjNrTV5e4AeS5RG4HlfE8fh78Tz32Dy6s+gbvkufNeO+GORoX7obpDKuap4MLo9ael R+A+INy2D5jQTW85sR97Sd5j8GPJX6pdhXUYVbLyPPn91497VoWvQ55Vqt3Ox+HsPl8Y l8KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680821875; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JXgNfES2xPmLIzA9XQu7yHUn8Ass15lCW/P1iL99/uE=; b=bpybsfauoOZKg+09vkvLsgG/CMX3D4Qhll54avDZAbECg4hQuz4fEsx2cHDhk3qyaW r+xuBF4bW14CDjks+yQtkDlBeBp0kDR2YVHyo9Cfj5di3uKks868DaTyahfZlVaN124y ZJxmhkkXlCrL8VhGwv/HfM0IZmiuqK/OQzB60vjEQmPY33nsx+WbC2cf4qdii/OH9mnW RLIK6hkUtu40H5PIPCWc42I8HpbFyUWzLYb4cV1nOWVQdyg94mxAuvbu/XGqAtQMkLZS +PitoBlaN/zpdEaEuDxAgQguu4/aXQrTQqucuCfO1Mx+oHCRbHOiLmK8h7saIjM8GFDh tBxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c6tJtkxC4M4sbutK2Nacg7gQ/oihFHgfpV8QR+c3C1jJOtXSDS cOsizoWthaijOEbGGwe3z+7k2vpxyYYO6Hm50XvFJdjQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2449:b0:1a0:1f4e:a890 with SMTP id l9-20020a170903244900b001a01f4ea890mr266381pls.1.1680821875058; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:57:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230406082004.2185420-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20230406082004.2185420-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> From: Yang Shi Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:57:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/huge_memory.c: warn with pr_warn_ratelimited instead of VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Andrew Morton , Miaohe Lin , Xu Yu , Tetsuo Handa , Naoya Horiguchi , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 1:20=E2=80=AFAM Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > From: Naoya Horiguchi > > split_huge_page_to_list() WARNs when called for huge zero pages, which > sounds to me too harsh because it does not imply a kernel bug, but just > notifies the event to admins. On the other hand, this is considered > as critical by syzkaller and makes its testing less efficient, which > seems to me harmful. > > So replace the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO with pr_warn_ratelimited. Makes sense to me. Reviewed-by: Yang Shi > > Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge= _zero_page") > Reported-by: syzbot+07a218429c8d19b1fb25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000a6f34a05e6efcd01@google.co= m/ > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > --- > mm/huge_memory.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 81a5689806af..06bcdd6f5060 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -2649,9 +2649,10 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, str= uct list_head *list) > VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio); > > is_hzp =3D is_huge_zero_page(&folio->page); > - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(is_hzp, folio); > - if (is_hzp) > + if (is_hzp) { > + pr_warn_ratelimited("Called split_huge_page for huge zero= page\n"); > return -EBUSY; > + } > > if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) > return -EBUSY; > -- > 2.25.1 >