Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp178815rwl; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:04:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bcg5EUHdg9f/HA0w2mTpoJQ+BQF1P0jzIigXNWzigrzlgCjhnNu/Nh5YCHIpWEHGnZn7Of X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:650:b0:1a2:7d:17ea with SMTP id kh16-20020a170903065000b001a2007d17eamr620861plb.56.1680825842227; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:04:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680825842; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O+SJeZNrzpDkysMRHAVZ2vH82Wxta/XhFVNxTzhXBSzq4dra9B36ogPaNm3KkvHY+m p9Y9itQdwjLd7UlijPaNPqqpUdjWeMczVQrfass0pK+us+P0QUwFaIRTvdJ5hg1Jl5pA EgLSRzUSs2DCqlx6lFec2SiJPTz7ch2iqWSivhcnPBwv6b9OvvaNz2Gx10vTUwhDB0jx b78KpFcVh+w9IcQuPa+z/kqTbXgZClFnnsz/GWhk9pwjnhP0GlVi0QwUJYeNbygr+pCw 18ucB5EJsql5dlH/lWdGYrrNU3j68MQU55oSkIefqygCIAIWfsTMBmKJQxOHfIR4PCDD 5+SQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=QMEPAF1E1IZrnwY8tvnyjvRvlqSvc75nThGi8TdMbSk=; b=WYTMp1XZL6khtromOS1HJU2bZljOmmWQCUq4kNxWZWJL14z0SFpAhC9Y3Cak3CxiHC JDAeU0Bq0YfBxHtFf/n+LIOpYBIJGZFW0MMJn7GdO60BjsEEeDEp1ANdPqepmzuSVKj2 m+JfLYYTk23DrLaSEmaKelrz8xUwL9hgFaMWbg5YnaOREc6EhaW4yQ6xNlj1grhuuq7q fYcMZQwKOJRVcgYKX9vVQ17mu8WC0+9sAnUvdwUthaNZzurfN2z3m4Pah43iDNQHLT0w 3U+3/mcqVRfFyfpqCZBG1m0Lnunaz55RuzzUpecLCLAEfgusZ+p/EYiHygca4R707dkW bKhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=I5M+mpkp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4-20020a17090341c400b001a1b65cdec5si2758656ple.525.2023.04.06.17.03.49; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=I5M+mpkp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233505AbjDFX7F (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:59:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54694 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230335AbjDFX7D (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:59:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55BDB83FF for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id z4-20020a25bb04000000b00b392ae70300so40956426ybg.21 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:59:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1680825541; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QMEPAF1E1IZrnwY8tvnyjvRvlqSvc75nThGi8TdMbSk=; b=I5M+mpkpEo0DpZjjc3xV/1Vnwnko9JlfUhRuT2hJz5PbN2QhxkFAEn/XBmbtG+8J3V Yo+IgIYa8xU4t1HA69pek6UjKqXVGp7OI0WjNiE1fIuO+b17QWIb014gxo67WBQti0gp fAlezY6tJ5AeHR3gZag6OqV0JabdUQIX9Aa58BOzm//JVlwPk94SMLG2hM6QBX2Damkx gdleJfoSbTtrihBnovd/u1r997cA8z6OzJoFIX5pEvJAVMZ+3BORW8pg0KgsHVW0fdCA a34BhxPLJ9wqnK+8n0JdKkJzVjWQ5skz5VyUI1ewbsU5Mx7IVpYlOLl80UPHQLUA99kP T/hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680825541; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QMEPAF1E1IZrnwY8tvnyjvRvlqSvc75nThGi8TdMbSk=; b=YC36M0L5tlYQ3YhSOQIzKf3AtQfF5XDbGnfsDwH+ZoSIhiih0MkDZ89hQgTWv/OS2e XGvbvWsBcr+QTWObed88QBt70uBoNLAN8siyHjlXWHNPTBxGHGexrnRLxizdm1N4u1xG j023Us57bY+tH9mqVAxClkGYPaNvvSBH5ZGO6Zl5YO4nKbWpaQCPfF+0ihyZzGfAcN9j luVhDr/wGLZCT4i6AwLiahFGNNoVupU0rTJjpkl5xWH+gzWIpMxsY4GE1puVJmTcp7nc jYYSoFQqwwF2aQ9QmHVLB4rdGsThKcSOepFLiVZ65aZfaZankYDcd+staPn5vlC2LOWV URsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f49HGtGJiYTzLsNV1sHc1hG8P+ju6ebXdsPveBm121JNp8izJD mNoRDA8WJj9gpDe/UAoS7U2imuF1Ggk= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:b384:0:b0:544:d154:fd3c with SMTP id r126-20020a81b384000000b00544d154fd3cmr65417ywh.1.1680825541640; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:59:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230214050757.9623-8-likexu@tencent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230214050757.9623-1-likexu@tencent.com> <20230214050757.9623-8-likexu@tencent.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: x86/cpuid: Use fast return for cpuid "0xa" leaf when !enable_pmu From: Sean Christopherson To: Like Xu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org KVM: x86: Explicitly zero cpuid "0xa" leaf when PMU is disabled On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, Like Xu wrote: > From: Like Xu > > Add an explicit !enable_pmu check as relying on kvm_pmu_cap to be > zeroed isn't obvious. Although when !enable_pmu, KVM will have > zero-padded kvm_pmu_cap to do subsequent cpuid leaf assignments, > one extra branch instruction saves a few subsequent zero-assignment > instructions, speeding things up a bit. Drop the performance blurb, as I stated multiple times, optimizing this code is a non-goal.