Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp214775rwl; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:48:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bN9WSvsmzeEwPcTCnAlrbtekfyURLHMeYKyTtHIgmCwVQOy586V2l4LX1q1cbZKdbisrym X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1389:b0:19d:611:2815 with SMTP id jx9-20020a170903138900b0019d06112815mr988735plb.42.1680828509230; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:48:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680828509; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VSaS5oWduCCrimHGBWgAlRfOMbcdgEBSa+EJPPDSPRkQSvZ5qC62K/KrI3eSyA65QD wX21QHghZUiI6tBJLvnBxrrBZvhW6BgR90WFDlqjqub5sKnZXLl4sWpEJbfwZMd9NlKV soOB9iWIqPQBty1x5nJMgqD2ZMhQjMH//g4v8rEGOpQiVL+FPMiWP59RuLP7kd2RH5++ NY7fkRkIoRh7WnTP/MgZbZ3ejZl+Abp8Z2ZcVNIZAC+FDD8Y4DbD1iJToI/C1fBT9jel HlKWDKLsdswjL85iHSNlkeAzSa062dRCCJFMcmdKQvUdo9Cn9QH6JorxdSrIsF/C95d/ g6nQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=qnSSgZKRdvbPIrtsfog7qn4pLOiwfaQdSDWiuSpARLE=; b=Oi00c4YGpa8QrTc7XI5uhu7HzCfhbEQhGjNhNx79lZ03pBFClm1eorupp4qO/urZ/e Sbqi7UyOoq6oX02KJnC4/olSJi31wT6TMAuE0C3Ms3Or7B1KFKEwpJT/eMvW7UKQE2Bm qTWcuoXl1zz/IKLIehBZLw4WCSDMxt1E2C06YbTf8pf2vJhIJJA1w+vHI1PJM67DyuhY S0BLkJsb1Q1KC1oR7PkeL6g5A+wfKvrqpFwmEpM19IuxwasM7uykh8xZvWuE8nwEYnN+ 0Sn696fIU9E+H18C7XElk+IHpnbyxcupd2Bc13xHDzTLbZ1v1OupRcJWzT3NScQW88lx dwlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="o2OHW9/K"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p1-20020a170902c70100b001a198422033si2664733plp.21.2023.04.06.17.48.15; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="o2OHW9/K"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233204AbjDGAla (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:41:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44866 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230251AbjDGAl3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:41:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD33083D0 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-54c1e4b7e63so24291487b3.20 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1680828088; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qnSSgZKRdvbPIrtsfog7qn4pLOiwfaQdSDWiuSpARLE=; b=o2OHW9/K0xbtzyHr9GqnQWipotyYMmLhxrUEZDAdlLhV7l3Rv8xdaX0WCUK4HYc7aV +DE9UFMpwbzj+oOOunqtG6WzIgGHk+rc1VFUdEWV9BxQEJMvraNlrjTkNt1VQs1ss7uk hny49017FAxeDd/2gezMIalb641PAZKXsnwMY4huIocYbnvUf+UqMmCwQmvDGvi4xQcW LJSM8Wdj5LhfvOtIeg+gW+2CL4Hnu2BVTL4EKY06qRgXxsdUAd5hNwZvHNz3AH4nLz/Y BEMqj3Asxf+KzhhFzgNduVDmqN7XOTj6uAnnZqn5/IUVHOrx4E+PT5MpENFn/zh9Uz7+ heNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680828088; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qnSSgZKRdvbPIrtsfog7qn4pLOiwfaQdSDWiuSpARLE=; b=4LiHqLiNN836O2YoGOHMGi5hCZhVIPh+BP7QlKnpdlMeWNAeXqtL5Xg6p7ifzT1Hrv 4X71fN1XSY7rXdf6yqrGASh32ae8RgfUkPi/TC+ZywjI+hjIawR5kO/2XdHx911nANgP SDZLnQIj7FhUqlYqzKbuX0CeaYVeTR8WbpJwkDJ6gpbuF6NegxnD9MPTXNvZ7/5aqTte ekjAELB1yWG7oQ9dl31Ubdhx2urq7wbGYl3dcVibvYY2rSYZXm3BXbt+IYjYXrq+skeE HRm4yXM7D7OfX3ApPMVZ3chc+fNriGyKXQMhBHNhBb/l9qA8nIDD4UBVHmWNX1Srkrzo 7Ehw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cHCLxTiWMiEjb9csF2ABS3inm2bWunK3Qn9/cTFJkuz5nkdl1h 8JUUk74JYBzTz060Ayq8wCmg+26KU/8= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6902:1588:b0:b8c:ba33:462b with SMTP id k8-20020a056902158800b00b8cba33462bmr144970ybu.2.1680828088140; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:41:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230214050757.9623-11-likexu@tencent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230214050757.9623-1-likexu@tencent.com> <20230214050757.9623-11-likexu@tencent.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 as a scattered flag From: Sean Christopherson To: Like Xu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This shortlog is flat out wrong. This patch does not add X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2, it adds a KVM-only leaf to redirect X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 to its architectural location when KVM queries the leaf, e.g. via guest_cpuid_has(). On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, Like Xu wrote: > From: Like Xu > > Considering that the core kernel may also want to know this flag, to avoid Please write changelogs so that they do not depend on the shortlog for context. I know the tip maintainers in particular like to make the changelog a continuation of the shortlog, but I find it really annoying, especially when reviewing in mutt, e.g. as I'm typing this, I don't even have the shortlog visible. In the vast majority of cases, being more explicit rarely adds more than a few chars, e.g. you'll save more by reducing the fluff in this changelog. > confusion this needs to be a scattered flag rather than a pure KVM flag so > that KVM can redirect it to the hardware-defined bit position, which is the > role of __feature_translate() and KVM_X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2. Like the shortlog, the changelog is best misleading, X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 is already a scattered flag. Define a KVM-only leaf for AMD's PerfMonV2 feature flag to redirect the kernel's scattered version to its architectural location, e.g. so that KVM can query guest support via guest_cpuid_has().