Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1809775rwl; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bFNR4J6tqt3EujNcNvyExAa4qH7v5OqJdYeLKqRZU8EVLeUFWSM84h9RmKBvFcH8Mz+bh+ X-Received: by 2002:a62:1911:0:b0:625:1487:f06c with SMTP id 17-20020a621911000000b006251487f06cmr4916907pfz.29.1680945331285; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1680945331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fjOH6PFt7yHvmurox6YWGxQW41s5B8qy9oZ8iYqi5azDXLyzUQ5NvBaFKIR5zK7Ykh 7k4tx9ZQMrR05/yUjd/p2uG+heXgWcrajEKX+PXNdTGKrTSn4sY59wXhVJod5HbU02ng 2XamAjlcDKRFLeB8dbn67eIo9Gv09o7+fNCwg9fCnZR3KX04HolGxRPTz+2Q8e0Rx8Kq 8/YpTFnMX7SYL8FY5pq3rK1fX8dGgnBB4p/jYXgY6TgdxnFeaUCPlxsKgqiaZyInalHu HNocvC5lraMWfNabKVgOnuovqFbDNmElGC4VVHnIUeagtM21ivoFqCfb/imAQ1IskC01 l2Zg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/ke/kkHx5jJ8p8u5Db7gYjLmpa5vYjG1sckdt2teMcE=; b=T2Hq3k29ZevBKvkxiIfojzCLjeGI+OGLYT/OXcgBBwSTuC8Wy18z8jckkQ9WMWYjCS 0eWTsx+JoM6wjr5LijD2YgAx4aUcOuly9O3tbsp3LTZlfBBuPRtMIRkP5ZJtRB6uMwVL 9JU788iI5BTH0HNFeloQ0qMUJYlWaP+3y52o7t84KExWpLmQ0GX4Cds/kcNHQZ9QueXl MTmUItH4T2HXtia/xenIk3TTFGGRSUe+3hVpRXnv1MlZH5xuzcNNAYJ5ZIr5DTOg68vp S/qkyO1iiQN8lRmGFhpgw0Nb5/DrQqc5U8MN0yzSfqbK3u7sTNVvQTBznRWZ9p1LWMqk vvvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v185-20020a6261c2000000b0062545446afcsi5459308pfb.165.2023.04.08.02.15.20; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229702AbjDHJOM (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 8 Apr 2023 05:14:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38738 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229456AbjDHJOL (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Apr 2023 05:14:11 -0400 Received: from out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.111]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D65CA22; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 02:14:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R201e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046059;MF=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=24;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VfZZJcu_1680945241; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VfZZJcu_1680945241) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 17:14:04 +0800 From: Shuai Xue To: tanxiaofei@huawei.com, mawupeng1@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, justin.he@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, ashish.kalra@amd.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, bp@alien8.de, cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, james.morse@arm.com, jarkko@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com, lvying6@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 17:13:57 +0800 Message-Id: <20230408091359.31554-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221027042445.60108-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20221027042445.60108-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org changes since v3 by addressing comments from Xiaofei: - do a force kill for abnormal memofy failure error such as invalid PA, unexpected severity, OOM, etc - pcik up tested-by tag from Ma Wupeng changes since v2 by addressing comments from Naoya: - rename mce_task_work to sync_task_work - drop ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE case in is_hest_sync_notify() - add steps to reproduce this problem in cover letter - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1aa0ca90-d44c-aa99-1e2d-bd2ae610b088@linux.alibaba.com/ changes since v1: - synchronous events by notify type - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206153354.92394-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com/ Currently, both synchronous and asynchronous error are queued and handled by a dedicated kthread in workqueue. And Memory failure for synchronous error is synced by a cancel_work_sync trick which ensures that the corrupted page is unmapped and poisoned. And after returning to user-space, the task starts at current instruction which triggering a page fault in which kernel will send SIGBUS to current process due to VM_FAULT_HWPOISON. However, the memory failure recovery for hwpoison-aware mechanisms does not work as expected. For example, hwpoison-aware user-space processes like QEMU register their customized SIGBUS handler and enable early kill mode by seting PF_MCE_EARLY at initialization. Then the kernel will directy notify the process by sending a SIGBUS signal in memory failure with wrong si_code: BUS_MCEERR_AO si_code to the actual user-space process instead of BUS_MCEERR_AR. To address this problem: - PATCH 1 sets mf_flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events which indicates error happened in current execution context - PATCH 2 separates synchronous error handling into task work so that the current context in memory failure is exactly belongs to the task consuming poison data. Then, kernel will send SIGBUS with proper si_code in kill_proc(). Lv Ying and XiuQi also proposed to address similar problem and we discussed about new solution to add a new flag(acpi_hest_generic_data::flags bit 8) to distinguish synchronous event. [2][3] The UEFI community still has no response. After a deep dive into the SDEI TRM, the SDEI notification should be used for asynchronous error. As SDEI TRM[1] describes "the dispatcher can simulate an exception-like entry into the client, **with the client providing an additional asynchronous entry point similar to an interrupt entry point**". The client (kernel) lacks complete synchronous context, e.g. systeam register (ELR, ESR, etc). So notify type is enough to distinguish synchronous event. To reproduce this problem: # STEP1: enable early kill mode #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error #einj_mem_uc single 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 injecting ... triggering ... signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000 page not present Test passed The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO error and it is not fact. After this patch set: # STEP1: enable early kill mode #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error #einj_mem_uc single 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 injecting ... triggering ... signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 page not present Test passed The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AR error as we expected. [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0054/latest/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20221205160043.57465-4-xiexiuqi@huawei.com/T/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221209095407.383211-1-lvying6@huawei.com/ Shuai Xue (2): ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 - mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ----- 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb