Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 09 Apr 2023 09:58:42 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH_v1_0/4=5D_Convert_SiFive_drive?= =?US-ASCII?Q?rs_from_SOC=5FFOO_dependencies_to_ARCH=5FFOO?=
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <ZDEAD5aWhvMxAj8F@infradead.org>
References: <20230406-undertake-stowing-50f45b90413a@spud> <ZDEAD5aWhvMxAj8F@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <834F56B9-E394-4F7C-97D8-BAA97F03362E@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk


On 8 April 2023 06:47:59 IST, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead=2Eorg> wrot=
e:
>On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor=2Edooley@microchip=2Ecom>
>>=20
>> RISC-V's SOC_FOO symbols for micro-archs are going away, and being
>> replaced with the more common ARCH_FOO pattern that is used by other
>> archs (and by vendors with a history outside of RISC-V)=2E
>
>And this is still the wrong way around=2E  This ARCH_ madness must not
>spread=2E  NAK=2E

As I said when you complained last, we asked the arm lads and there was no=
 interest there in doing things differently & that's just one architecture=
=2E
Nor was there in adding a SOC_ symbol from some of the people who do more =
than one ISA=2E

You're welcome to send reverts for my first round of conversions and patch=
es converting all the ARCH_ stuff RISC-V has to SOC_=2E
I'll happily ack a complete conversion to SOC_=2E
I don't care if it is arch or soc, I just want things to be used consisten=
tly=2E