Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1680610554.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> <20230408104938.74a36f7a@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20230408104938.74a36f7a@jic23-huawei>
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:16:22 +0300
Message-ID: <CANhJrGPBdJwaoDFy=Rp38k_uSsZrzzMSSKxswwbur67YGG0ZrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@iit.it>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

la 8. huhtik. 2023 klo 12.34 Jonathan Cameron (jic23@kernel.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:24:15 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > IIO has very nice facilities for efficiently providing data from a
> > device to user (and probably also vice-versa - but I've not used that
> > direction). Getting started with IIO may not be so simple though - some
> > of the concepts like triggers and buffers are quite unique.
> >
> > This series tries to make it easier for a newcomer to write his/her first
> > IIO driver by adding some documentation to used enums. Series does not
> > provide extensive documentation but just documents those few entries I
> > have become familiar with - but it still aims to be a starting point for
> > others to add missing bits and pieces.
> >
> > This series is marked as v2 because the patch 1 was previously sent as a
> > stan-alone RFC to collect the missing channel units. RFC can be seen
> > here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/10a855f9adc1d710150b7f647500c3c6a769f9ca.1677243698.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
> >
> > Patches 2 and 3 were added as a result of discussion followed by the
> > RFC.
>
> Something odd happened on this resend. Patch 1 didn't make it to me
> or patchwork.  I'll reply to previous posting instead.
>

It seems checkpatch.pl + some of the patches were only picking the
huawei.com address. Maybe that is the reason?

This really was a resend with no changes other than rebasing it -
hence reviewing the v2 was absolutely fine. Thanks for the review!
I'll check the suggestions and send v3 later this week.

Yours,
  -- Matti