Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:31:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:31:21 -0500 Received: from cs182072.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.182.72]:21632 "EHLO cs182072.pp.htv.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:31:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3C1901BC.C5E7936C@welho.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:30:04 +0200 From: Mika Liljeberg X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru CC: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.liljeberg@nokia.com Subject: Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2 In-Reply-To: <200112131759.UAA01376@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > This is not related to that problem. I believe you. Nevertheless, it appears to be a problem that happens in the LAST-ACK state. > Please, make cat /proc/net/tcp at this point. I'll do that if it happens again. > To be honest I do not believe > that tcpdump finishes _here_. When will retransmit timer expire? Taking > into account that 10.0.5.3 has rto of 14 seconds (distance between retransmits > of its FIN :-)), linux can have even more. In the case of such bad connection > closing fin-wait-2 via abort is pretty normal. I'm afraid it did end there. :( The data transfer was unidirectional from the remote towards the Linux machine. During the SYN exchange the RTT is less than one second. The rest is queuing delay. So Linux should have a fairly low RTO. There were no FIN retransmissions, I'm sorry to say. > Alexey Cheers, MikaL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/