Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:33:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:33:41 -0500 Received: from mail.libertysurf.net ([213.36.80.91]:54562 "EHLO mail.libertysurf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:33:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:39:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= X-X-Sender: To: "David S. Miller" cc: , , , , Subject: Re: highmem, aic7xxx, and vfat: too few segs for dma mapping In-Reply-To: <20011212.160631.14975630.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20011213173234.B1979-100000@gerard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > From: G?rard Roudier > Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:22:30 +0100 (CET) > > PCI was intended to be implemented as a LOCAL BUS with all agents on the > LOCAL BUS being able to talk with any other agent using a flat addressing > scheme. Your PCI thing does not look like true PCI to me, but rather like > some bad mutant that has every chance not to survive a long time. > > Intentions are neither here nor there. PCI is MORE USEFUL, because > you CAN do things like IOMMU's and treat PCI like a complete seperate > I/O bus world. But there are a couple of things you cannot do with PCI. For example, you cannot mow the lawn with PCI. But since there is always room for improvement... :-) :-) G?rard. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/