Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp4424173rwl; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350b8Js4gVzeLM55XE8xNBlYA26wRW+lQXEL8UOjeg0s3WOhyFEGwAevtMfOb5dXj9zZ7zQEz X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3e88:b0:246:5787:6f5d with SMTP id rj8-20020a17090b3e8800b0024657876f5dmr12679140pjb.10.1681148892504; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681148892; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O1VSmJ/rvqb3h4t5iinjDmBUsZ9QQshM3LUO/jn2zTqF3Wf99lcIurcdK2YkBTi2cO t2V1DUruHn5j8vBRxWRQmEbKZIAUtEWWfm1SD0mM6MdR2fW/qs/kvvKozHI/iAJWr6Lf 7E0O2cZ+JPP8rLG4r6txS1/NUn4SGX9v6rSW7noidQnfozZsemUy/EvpoKKCJGf/4ywa XdoSp4gFRxlQKEZLal4vWhk/eKEMwWP0Y0N0GASk1O8NxIqbQs1pwPfL5S53jgwvoha0 ObJnEs1BX8cPn0oaX3zv27KmbTvhaxvN9XdWMuGkf0TPfSGovG2P2GqoXTazr3V8nCYM DhQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=DgdTqbVzw71tTd4ag9o32WVDiPYnzhfJtt3L4vDyud4=; b=aR2p/rP+iCXAI1iCeNWkFM7dfvUzfq1ZbwXIdyT7gwnTVp7RLRK79U3r/M0EAKzTS2 lXiJBLUzlj9esA/7FQez5FFLO+n7UriTCCqU71ybI13DJtVKSTcW/9Cqe7nrwlxjCdiS Gc9ubj8GidP7OBbf51xOxqODC0ao8CjVbavbB1xQ5SrOYWQmqX17aszBepSmNR+jutJG UjPm56Mx90c8561j0EL5uXCeBMpvrKuJpvif5x6x81UR9xzCwan4nKhi3+zG3TeEmyau y5Fu262SNa4jEmujS57zEgZmjD0HvBXl9nE7+9+pvHHQSD5f97OGcLVjGCynS5bcyUnT cFYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=SoqPMZpT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m10-20020a17090b068a00b0023369af18e2si10792816pjz.72.2023.04.10.10.48.00; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=SoqPMZpT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230319AbjDJReM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:34:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56544 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230317AbjDJReI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:34:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x64a.google.com (mail-pl1-x64a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::64a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D21F2136 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id j2-20020a170902da8200b001a055243657so3664608plx.19 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1681148046; h=to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DgdTqbVzw71tTd4ag9o32WVDiPYnzhfJtt3L4vDyud4=; b=SoqPMZpTyZwP61CDjwraoEOUKQ6SbjHX5rIqhvDo+V15EwzSz9z/OJD+azI4zR1tOb 4MVQ2pDBpi0ly5BnCIcrORoO6aB/+3LRpoaeIUl15+Im9xxSL/02WNUzNhEYtcC4VtEk ZC1HyoiNtCkJq3odced1ushJymkc1fD55J5Ab27faYzhMZzHJ9toLDxGQm0am4E0MOHG YEZpkvgvo1sKCJ/7hPVVz1F2hvZmMW+dKCZGNPzjbDjz2Faybod4XYLUZUQcqJEAOkTy NYPPaxJ39JRV3kj2L0hE4K88Qu3/H1xdnZWh5dh2JSVhwhN4kO45vQgbwgOooZTay2Wf SQuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681148046; h=to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DgdTqbVzw71tTd4ag9o32WVDiPYnzhfJtt3L4vDyud4=; b=Llno79PSmoOsnbQeZwAwvEhOkGeWumTUUfSBqPITmJ4sXiwqKBTOR4eDUNPu3Nb5zS eHsebrN2yAU6QjHWAhnXv11m4M+YrewBxt3eFUElraiz9twZ91j7w5mzYZ7F9lEsXqyK CED4sHALk6FG13EpDrbS6rVwlhf8Qr1zHHVK7YtWy77GfSP8mamj0KpSk5EqT3Dy9Cc2 I/K0eIwXp/SXQTtWeWNFgfLVcmGmFW0bTvydl5QeAq+xvpO9HawTaqdzAS/iMU5Uuxq5 z970CvBpOnAslexuPcUQBYY1LaFpYOdi98IvhhisZtE3DKdeqhmFOHJQEYvqnFzS4TH4 cdsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cMZQSp4s2sBIsdkt41srQwOI3hlQwMGzSuaGbbKQ7t2Icj+z5y 4CoKZmmAL+yQS6hsDOhpji/m1EYFGnE= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a63:d50a:0:b0:513:57ce:d61c with SMTP id c10-20020a63d50a000000b0051357ced61cmr2136243pgg.7.1681148046446; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:34:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230405004520.421768-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230405004520.421768-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Fix unpermitted XTILE CPUID reporting From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lewis , Mingwei Zhang , Jim Mattson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 04, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote: > This is v4 of Aaron's "Clean up the supported xfeatures" series. > > Fix a bug where KVM treats/reports XTILE_CFG as supported without > XTILE_DATA being supported if userspace queries the supported CPUID but > doesn't request access to AMX, a.k.a. XTILE_DATA. If userspace reflects > that CPUID info back into KVM, the resulting VM may use it verbatim and > attempt to shove bad data into XCR0: XTILE_CFG and XTILE_DATA must be > set/cleared as a pair in XCR0, despite being enumerated separately. > > This is effectively compile-tested only on my end. Aaron, can you give this series a quick spin (and review) to make sure it works as intended? I'd like to get this into 6.4, but I'd really like it to be tested on AMX hardware first.