Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp4427387rwl; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZrF9Ft5D8T2AduMyFXAwou8WHZ7v3cJ/AwUovwkYBOVfavZZn7U/zv/5Y/AI5u+MTRb2GY X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dac3:b0:1a6:4e7b:702d with SMTP id q3-20020a170902dac300b001a64e7b702dmr1523101plx.42.1681149109422; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681149109; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bBtY40zSFh15t1u5t+x8Ocs4nNeb8FzK8478OFTs4sjzNXOY+P5oxwNFdWEP1Fhu4S wQm3v69hRHi1DDjZMBMo60SYyqSfZgr/1AgKhjLiKHSHlaG9NP1cI4757NAjcf1ZY+Ew VxwBYoTkA+S6pME079f2YizdZzDoZtLRRemkAWlJvFMbtE3ebXVZZsjibLTEuOfdwSax YbohetBMuV5iLfjd837E5oclmtR7eqUnxz/cVSJ5Sx8jr+Ak9YRlSWpgN8GacV6soAY9 LqhlV4TK6WWOP6jbW6h4wGQXXcCaTMRqMDzmEwcEc2KIOXuuGHRGOXaf/pIt577/Rr8c Scbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id :dkim-signature; bh=+ikKE6m67IVKFNKGFB9m6CHWYn/7a3mME8vsRoaNSVU=; b=hYrKI+fkNzyRecJ+VDwm2pK1+38vquasQAqw1SFVZyKAUaH+0Vt8K78KMKEP+X0LA2 z5sPvvHe5eL0v1PT/W6sJj2UjwCSDn7gqvJm+8ZQKBSWB2v/keodIJbGkcpCYDmAAp+r 3uxTGezUNcmh0UjtvlG0e8oNSJzRfK+mIvsgNvCWSSo8Rsx2WCjCd2CXskDDOro7P5eT 3EBCn+1Jj9drv/1x8ZOyQZR1Y+VHbbGO6TzzvJBeY2EOqSJ/fo1KBOqOqbWFMBYmFpQU aTEE5H9aA8YAEKUOKXfLyubjlbxIwZfEFXQ3y+OOyLNA7oOODlhPgATC6IzgKkVxpQUT hh3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="G1/8Bltf"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q74-20020a632a4d000000b00519a4c520f8si3467902pgq.237.2023.04.10.10.51.37; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="G1/8Bltf"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230047AbjDJRr7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:47:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37426 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230365AbjDJRri (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:47:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf36.google.com (mail-qv1-xf36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34A1171C; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf36.google.com with SMTP id ly9so7081644qvb.5; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681148855; x=1683740855; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+ikKE6m67IVKFNKGFB9m6CHWYn/7a3mME8vsRoaNSVU=; b=G1/8BltfY1JYBrgojCKl6vcW5e+DHQyGCUvX9LxJNGL5dUB8ycwV7hkndnZDctkv1a dg4Tw/+O/5Ctn0hrMEcJuri9a9z/ipdMCkhgU8Jkb//+rXbsovsXlxNh4dp04punRYe8 D7c+LIMWWl1BsrZ71ehuW6Mbc77RBLuFWyM9eSEB+MsTZGfeD5dw2naHSZaIqX1EYaBw 6J7S4MI8QJeOE0tW9WNHp3Vp03L7daEygQpsIDvGytbYwHrSrFBIwUF7uK5z1vsWU3d9 ZS5eEs37e+rVe84nvPLbeIm/mk2HZmArC8D3VkuLV0K/52UxI6TtyX5qNdSTA8UjGOP1 6vfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681148855; x=1683740855; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+ikKE6m67IVKFNKGFB9m6CHWYn/7a3mME8vsRoaNSVU=; b=kwugBIblBjzoEYlRIcCxaqPjKk/yKua9x+m9fdxW123gGRXBlbh/1t16MT5nJTJVJD hNl0YGxnLTDWcgEzSO6iTHj5c5afeqIAhl+j17cE0j4od6wW9KY+RKQIFs0nwmC6ACvB Vnro6eydJPWsOrAjq2AraZEi52izMJF3dIZc6P/Df4re30QnHSD9YUcYFfs+qCZdGiTD FfGUe/Kqi86CrhXTFXUQZcblj0lvwsSGUD7XpPIfwedSGA/qIQFuskdGb148ckAdoFtl 2+KBtX4aq/XNCQwFsgjPAHbaVr3Q9DntPsI6hSfFZAopwKEazLJnMgNbGoPaZNbV82WI Oe0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eXOigj4X8I6LHyyOPRlRwlCRXI0Gid7ASCycY4ik3A/jxRkSt7 XB9lBwEK2JDL7Xg3isZeWy8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:f67:b0:5e0:30cc:8305 with SMTP id iy7-20020a0562140f6700b005e030cc8305mr71072qvb.3.1681148854761; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3-20020ac86a03000000b003e63324e123sm3093156qtr.61.2023.04.10.10.47.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601E327C0054; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:47:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:47:33 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdekvddgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpeeuohhq uhhnucfhvghnghcuoegsohhquhhnrdhfvghnghesghhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhephedugfduffffteeutddvheeuveelvdfhleelieevtdeguefhgeeuveei udffiedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epsghoqhhunhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqieelvdeghedt ieegqddujeejkeehheehvddqsghoqhhunhdrfhgvnhhgpeepghhmrghilhdrtghomhesfh higihmvgdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iad51458e:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:47:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:46:16 -0700 From: Boqun Feng To: Wedson Almeida Filho Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wedson Almeida Filho Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] rust: sync: introduce `LockedBy` Message-ID: References: <20230408075340.25237-1-wedsonaf@gmail.com> <20230408075340.25237-13-wedsonaf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230408075340.25237-13-wedsonaf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 04:53:40AM -0300, Wedson Almeida Filho wrote: > From: Wedson Almeida Filho > > This allows us to have data protected by a lock despite not being > wrapped by it. Access is granted by providing evidence that the lock is > held by the caller. > > Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho > --- > v1 -> v2: Added build_assert to rule out zero-sized types > v2 -> v3: Improve comments around panics and support for ZSTs > > rust/kernel/sync.rs | 2 + > rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs | 2 +- > rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs > index 431402180aa8..d219ee518eff 100644 > --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs > @@ -10,10 +10,12 @@ use crate::types::Opaque; > mod arc; > mod condvar; > pub mod lock; > +mod locked_by; > > pub use arc::{Arc, ArcBorrow, UniqueArc}; > pub use condvar::CondVar; > pub use lock::{mutex::Mutex, spinlock::SpinLock}; > +pub use locked_by::LockedBy; > > /// Represents a lockdep class. It's a wrapper around C's `lock_class_key`. > #[repr(transparent)] > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs > index c365bc909dff..84d8d7d01aaa 100644 > --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ pub struct Lock { > _pin: PhantomPinned, > > /// The data protected by the lock. > - data: UnsafeCell, > + pub(crate) data: UnsafeCell, > } > > // SAFETY: `Lock` can be transferred across thread boundaries iff the data it protects can. > diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ab0ecb013f54 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/locked_by.rs > @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +//! A wrapper for data protected by a lock that does not wrap it. > + > +use super::{lock::Backend, lock::Lock}; > +use core::{cell::UnsafeCell, ptr}; > + > +/// Allows access to some data to be serialised by a lock that does not wrap it. > +/// > +/// In most cases, data protected by a lock is wrapped by the appropriate lock type, e.g., > +/// [`super::Mutex`] or [`super::SpinLock`]. [`LockedBy`] is meant for cases when this is not > +/// possible. For example, if a container has a lock and some data in the contained elements needs > +/// to be protected by the same lock. > +/// > +/// [`LockedBy`] wraps the data in lieu of another locking primitive, and only allows access to it > +/// when the caller shows evidence that the 'external' lock is locked. It panics if the evidence > +/// refers to the wrong instance of the lock. > +/// > +/// # Examples > +/// > +/// The following is an example for illustrative purposes: `InnerDirectory::bytes_used` is an > +/// aggregate of all `InnerFile::bytes_used` and must be kept consistent; so we wrap `InnerFile` in > +/// a `LockedBy` so that it shares a lock with `InnerDirectory`. This allows us to enforce at > +/// compile-time that access to `InnerFile` is only granted when an `InnerDirectory` is also > +/// locked; we enforce at run time that the right `InnerDirectory` is locked. > +/// > +/// ``` > +/// use kernel::sync::{LockedBy, Mutex}; > +/// > +/// struct InnerFile { > +/// bytes_used: u64, > +/// } > +/// > +/// struct File { > +/// _ino: u32, > +/// inner: LockedBy, > +/// } > +/// > +/// struct InnerDirectory { > +/// /// The sum of the bytes used by all files. > +/// bytes_used: u64, > +/// _files: Vec, > +/// } > +/// > +/// struct Directory { > +/// _ino: u32, > +/// inner: Mutex, > +/// } > +/// > +/// /// Prints `bytes_used` from both the directory and file. > +/// fn print_bytes_used(dir: &Directory, file: &File) { > +/// let guard = dir.inner.lock(); > +/// let inner_file = file.inner.access(&guard); > +/// pr_info!("{} {}", guard.bytes_used, inner_file.bytes_used); > +/// } > +/// > +/// /// Increments `bytes_used` for both the directory and file. > +/// fn inc_bytes_used(dir: &Directory, file: &File) { > +/// let mut guard = dir.inner.lock(); > +/// guard.bytes_used += 10; > +/// > +/// let file_inner = file.inner.access_mut(&mut guard); > +/// file_inner.bytes_used += 10; > +/// } > +/// > +/// /// Creates a new file. > +/// fn new_file(ino: u32, dir: &Directory) -> File { > +/// File { > +/// _ino: ino, > +/// inner: LockedBy::new(&dir.inner, InnerFile { bytes_used: 0 }), > +/// } > +/// } > +/// ``` > +pub struct LockedBy { > + owner: *const U, > + data: UnsafeCell, > +} > + > +// SAFETY: `LockedBy` can be transferred across thread boundaries iff the data it protects can. > +unsafe impl Send for LockedBy {} > + > +// SAFETY: `LockedBy` serialises the interior mutability it provides, so it is `Sync` as long as the > +// data it protects is `Send`. > +unsafe impl Sync for LockedBy {} > + > +impl LockedBy { > + /// Constructs a new instance of [`LockedBy`]. > + /// > + /// It stores a raw pointer to the owner that is never dereferenced. It is only used to ensure > + /// that the right owner is being used to access the protected data. If the owner is freed, the > + /// data becomes inaccessible; if another instance of the owner is allocated *on the same > + /// memory location*, the data becomes accessible again: none of this affects memory safety > + /// because in any case at most one thread (or CPU) can access the protected data at a time. > + pub fn new(owner: &Lock, data: T) -> Self { > + Self { > + owner: owner.data.get(), Given we use the address of the `data` as a key to verify holding a lock, I think we should use `Pin<_>` in the function signature, i.e. pub fn new(owner: Pin<&Lock, data: T) -> Self { Self { owner: owner.get_ref().data.get() data: UnsafeCell::new(data), } } Thoughts? Regards, Boqun > + data: UnsafeCell::new(data), > + } > + } > +} > + > +impl LockedBy { > + /// Returns a reference to the protected data when the caller provides evidence (via a > + /// reference) that the owner is locked. > + /// > + /// `U` cannot be a zero-sized type (ZST) because there are ways to get an `&U` that matches > + /// the data protected by the lock without actually holding it. > + /// > + /// # Panics > + /// > + /// Panics if `owner` is different from the data protected by the lock used in > + /// [`new`](LockedBy::new). > + pub fn access<'a>(&'a self, owner: &'a U) -> &'a T { > + // Detect the usage of SZTs, which are supported, at compile time. > + crate::build_assert!(core::mem::size_of::() > 0); > + if !ptr::eq(owner, self.owner) { > + panic!("mismatched owners"); > + } > + > + // SAFETY: `owner` is evidence that the owner is locked. > + unsafe { &*self.data.get() } > + } > + > + /// Returns a mutable reference to the protected data when the caller provides evidence (via a > + /// mutable owner) that the owner is locked mutably. > + /// > + /// `U` cannot be a zero-sized type (ZST) because there are ways to get an `&mut U` that > + /// matches the data protected by the lock without actually holding it. > + /// > + /// Showing a mutable reference to the owner is sufficient because we know no other references > + /// can exist to it. > + /// > + /// # Panics > + /// > + /// Panics if `owner` is different from the data protected by the lock used in > + /// [`new`](LockedBy::new). > + pub fn access_mut<'a>(&'a self, owner: &'a mut U) -> &'a mut T { > + // Detect the usage of SZTs, which are supported, at compile time. > + crate::build_assert!(core::mem::size_of::() > 0); > + if !ptr::eq(owner, self.owner) { > + panic!("mismatched owners"); > + } > + > + // SAFETY: `owner` is evidence that there is only one reference to the owner. > + unsafe { &mut *self.data.get() } > + } > +} > -- > 2.34.1 >