Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:39:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:39:01 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:49156 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:38:49 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200112131938.WAA02795@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2 To: Mika.Liljeberg@welho.com (Mika Liljeberg) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:38:35 +0300 (MSK) Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.liljeberg@nokia.com In-Reply-To: <3C1901BC.C5E7936C@welho.com> from "Mika Liljeberg" at Dec 13, 1 09:30:04 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > have a fairly low RTO. There were no FIN retransmissions, I'm sorry to > say. I believe, believe. :-) It is possible _only_ if rto is at 120 seconds. It is the only case when retransmissions do not happen and this would be normal behaviour. For now it is the only hypothesis and it will be clear from /proc/net/tcp, whether is this right or not. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/