Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760048AbXIYRcV (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752764AbXIYRcJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:09 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:32890 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbXIYRcI (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:31:42 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Jones Cc: Russell King , Greg.Chandler@wellsfargo.com, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more} ARM/StrongARM Message-Id: <20070925103142.c93719b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070925172255.GL8127@redhat.com> References: <1E7A4807A136DF45AD33DB341D93C3BD1F0C19@msgswbmnmsp46.wellsfargo.com> <20070925073132.GA29127@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070925143651.GA2769@redhat.com> <20070925095229.d1aec1a5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070925165834.GE2769@redhat.com> <20070925100839.8d2e7b40.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070925172255.GL8127@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1079 Lines: 24 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones wrote: > > > > OK, here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm3/broken-out/fix-x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch > > > > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386 > > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks. > > Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box > (which should be the same as a native build). Was that with allnoconfig? > The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually > exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f') > Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ? Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended up merging verion 56. It was awful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/